Chapter 36第36章
雷聲與蟬鳴
也斯 (Leung Ping-kwan) 風格
將欲歙之,必固張之。將欲弱之,必固強之。將欲廢之,必固興之。將欲奪之,必固與之。呢段好似兵法——你想收縮佢,先要等佢膨脹。你想削弱佢,先要等佢強盛。呢個叫微明——一種好細微嘅智慧。柔弱勝剛強。魚不可脫於淵——魚離唔開深水。國之利器不可以示人——真正厲害嘅嘢唔好攞出嚟晒。我諗呢章講緊嘅係時機——所有嘢都有佢自己嘅節奏。
Original Text經文
將欲歙之,必固張之;將欲弱之,必固強之;將欲廢之,必固興之;將欲奪之,必固與之。是謂微明。柔弱勝剛強。魚不可脫於淵,國之利器不可以示人。
Character-by-Character Gloss逐字注音釋義
素履之往
木心 (Mu Xin) 风格
将欲歙之,必固张之。将欲弱之,必固强之。将欲废之,必固兴之。将欲取之,必固与之。 四组「将欲」——每一个收缩之前都有一个膨胀。这不是阴谋,是物理。 是谓微明。柔弱胜刚强。 鱼不可脱于渊,国之利器不可以示人。 两条规矩:鱼要待在深处,底牌不能亮给别人。真正的力量从来不表演。
Interpretive Translations
The Watercourse Way
In the style of Alan Watts
If you want to shrink something, you must first let it expand. If you want to weaken something, you must first let it grow strong. If you want to eliminate something, you must first let it flourish. If you want to take something, you must first give it. This is called subtle illumination. The soft and weak overcome the hard and strong. A fish cannot leave its deep waters — and a nation's sharp weapons should never be displayed. It's not about cunning manipulation. It's about understanding the rhythm of nature: everything that reaches its extreme naturally reverses. You don't have to push it over — just wait.
The Archaic Revival
In the style of Terence McKenna
This is one of the most strategically dense passages in all of Chinese philosophy. Before contracting, a thing must first expand. Before weakening, it must first strengthen. Before being discarded, it must first be elevated. This is called 'subtle illumination' — wei ming — and it describes the inherent dialectic of all processes. Everything carries within itself the seed of its own reversal. The soft overcomes the hard. And then this cryptic final line: a fish must not leave the deep, and a state's sharp instruments must not be shown to people. What's really going on here is a description of how power actually works in nature — not through display but through concealment, not through assertion but through patience. The dominator shows his weapons; the sage keeps his wisdom in the depths.
Wang Bi Commentary王弼注
【注】泉永河上公注本 明此章 將欲去之必固張之之性令其自極也微明也 固興與之心圓強之心固強之將欲廢之 柔弱者生之徒也故勝剛強也 魚不可脫於淵則必見失也 利器利國之器也唯因物之性不假刑以理物則國之利器也示人者任刑以理則也魚脫於淵則不可制也 利國兩而立刑則亦失其魚麗於淵則必見失矣
Commentary from the Siku Quanshu (欽定四庫全書) edition, first-pass OCR from woodblock print scans.
Commentary Translations注釋翻譯
The Watercourse Way
In the style of Alan Watts
Wang Bi calls this 'subtle illumination.' The principle is beautifully simple: if you want to contract something, first let its nature expand to its limit. If you want to weaken it, first let it strengthen fully. This is not a strategy of cunning manipulation — it is an observation about how things actually work. Let their inherent tendencies run their course, and reversal happens naturally. 'The soft and weak overcome the hard and strong' is the fundamental law. Then Wang Bi adds a striking image: a fish must not leave the deep waters, or it will certainly be caught and lost. The 'sharp instruments of the state' — its real tools of governance — work only when they follow the nature of things without resorting to punishment and coercion. Display them openly, use force overtly, and you lose control just as a fish loses its life when it leaves the depths.
The Archaic Revival
In the style of Terence McKenna
Wang Bi titles this 'subtle illumination' — 「微明」 — and what he describes is essentially a theory of phase transitions. To contract something, first solidify its desire to expand; to weaken it, first solidify its commitment to being strong. You are not manipulating the system — you are allowing its own dynamics to carry it past the tipping point. 'The soft and weak overcome the hard and strong' is stated as natural law, not moral instruction. Then the image of the fish: it must not leave the deep waters, or it will be exposed and destroyed. Wang Bi reads 'the sharp instruments of the state' as governance that follows the nature of things — no coercive punishment, no display of force. The moment you brandish your instruments of control, you have left the depths. You are the fish flopping on the bank. This is a profound critique of transparency in governance — not the modern sense of open government, but the idea that the most effective power is the power no one can see operating. The deep water is the unconscious infrastructure of social order.